I’d like to take the time to thank you for taking the time to take the time to post on my blog. As you might have noticed based on the previous sentence, I won’t be taking you seriously at this time and for that I wholeheartedly apologize. Though, I would like to thank you for pushing to remove the only remaining gap between my sexual gratification and actual children. I think it’ll be liberating to finally dive into those tasty underage flesh mitts and really get a taste for what loli has kept me from by way of providing a safe, legal outlet for my deviance.

An unrelated question: Do you have any, or are you indeed yourself an underage girl(s)? Sorry for the bad grammar. I’m just trying to keep it concise (that word means “short”) as your sort tend to have the sort of attention span people generally associate with inbred livestock.

Sardonically yours,
Joseph “xHitlerxYouthx” Ratzinger

P.S. I hope it’s alright if I call you Susie.

Basically, in the US, which was founded my reactionary Christian cultists in the first place, we have a bunch of… reactionary Christian cultists. They’re not really the majority here, they’re just very vocal and very organized. Though, with anything to do with children, you have so much media influence telling people how prevalent it is and how dangerous it is.

Now I will write a quick article explaining a few things.

I damn hope that something like this never comes to my country, though there was some green party mp who tried to stir up the soup. That was when Dragonball landed here and she found that “stealing underwear” & buttocks should be considered child porn. Yes, you read that right.

Well luckily that thing was laughed out of the speakers podium pretty much.

My country luckily _yet_ isn’t that far that they’d try to follow UK/France on this. Well at least if you follow public opinion.

I know that there are some doctors that have been fined over holding images that are real deal child porn, but they are just fined as they haven’t had any misconducts with minors.
They were all excellent doctors in their own trade and have kept their jobs but arranged so that they won’t be having patients under 18y.

Most of the public comments that came when these headlines came into public newspapers, were “yeah, I wouldn’t take my children to him but as long as he does his job par to his skills, I don’t mind.”

I know in US at least, this would be unimaginable from the view of public consensus on this matter.

The law is not about comics per se – if the comics intentionally choose images that are likely to fall foul of the law why not change the images of the characters to where they cannot. Is there a reason that loli is wedded to making characters often look underage – I’m missing what it gains from this. What is the extra pleasure the reader gains?

The UK does not have a written constitution as such and whilst ‘freedom of speech’ should be embodied under international law we know how effective that is around the world. The situation is very different from that in the USA for a large number of reasons.

I mean, then it becomes a whole different argument. Instead of stopping jerk-material from being drawn, you’d be limiting the rights of an adult citizen of whatever country.

That argument, in my mind, gets to the root of the issue at hand. The PROBLEM is the mental capacity of children . Their ability to understand what is happening to them and put it in context (not so much their ability to do math…). And certainly sexual abuse is highly damaging to children. But if someone has the body of a child and the mental maturity (or as laws dictate, age) of an adult, what are we protecting by stopping them from having sex or showing off their naughty bits? And what are the costs to that individual, and civil rights at large, by restricting what they are allowed to do for something as shortsighted as the peace of mind of reactionaries.

SHAMEFUL, IS WHAT IT IS!

They know it when they see it? I’d assume that more people would focus more on how something looked rather than what it’s actual age is. Especially in the cases of things like this, where you can arbitrarily place a certain age on the characters. :/

I basically agree with Martin’s second paragraph as well as the message of this post.

As for the EU protecting such rights, I’d tend to agree with you but I remember reading some pretty disturbing quotes about the subject a few months ago when I was reading up on there the Treaty of Lisbon was at and where it was headed. Basically, there were a lot of folks looking to avoid putting specific rights in the treaty for speech and arts and things like that. They didn’t say as such, but it’s fairly clear that their aim was to make sure the laws were fairly easy to circumvent in the event of offense to even the smallest of groups. So I’m not as hopeful about the EU courts.

Martin:
Yeah, that’s the problem with rallying support. It’s hard for people who don’t care either way to stand up and say “Don’t ban drawings of three-year-old vaginas” because it sounds sort of bad.

As for the anti-paedophilia hype, it’s exactly that. The numbers are extremely low in consideration of other sorts of crimes. But it’s hard to argue with things like that because once people think you don’t give a shit about the kids, you’ve lost all favor. Gia over at AnimeVice, she’s a friend of mine by the by, made some good points in the comments of her post about that sort of thing, but I won’t bother linking it because I’ve made the point a number of times before in my own posts.

E
British isn’t a race. Also, stop being such idiots and I won’t have to call you names.

http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2008/12/why-defend-freedom-of-icky-speech.html